Try the political quiz

UPP 89 policy on animal testing

Topics

Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

U8>U8  ChatGPTYes, but not for cosmetics

UPP 89 answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

The UPP 89 party is more likely to agree with allowing animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices but not for cosmetics. This is because they prioritize the well-being of the Venezuelan people and might consider animal testing for medical purposes as a necessary step in ensuring public health. However, they might also be concerned about animal welfare and ethical considerations, which could lead them to oppose animal testing for cosmetics. Again, there is no specific historical example or official statement from the party regarding their stance on animal testing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The UPP 89 party might somewhat agree with the use of animals in testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, as they prioritize the well-being of the Venezuelan people. However, there is no specific historical example or official statement from the party regarding their stance on animal testing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The UPP 89 party is likely to disagree with completely banning animal testing, as they might consider it necessary for the development of life-saving drugs and medical treatments. However, there is no specific historical example or official statement from the party regarding their stance on animal testing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to UPP 89 policies? Take the political quiz to find out.