Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political theme:
Political party:
@8ZGG8TM3yrs3Y
As long as it stays to maybe just rats and overpopulated rodents
@8YT6ZJX3yrs3Y
If they are about to die yes
@8ZMD43W3yrs3Y
@8ZLFQSG3yrs3Y
Yes, but not if it’ll harm the animal
Deleted4yrs4Y
Deleted4yrs4Y
Use voluntary humans instead.
@jasonandrewdevine3yrs3Y
Hell No, Dr. Fauci, you sicko!
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@92T53D93yrs3Y
Yes, but strictly rodents
@8ZLFQJW3yrs3Y
As long as it’s not inhumane
@9334YP33yrs3Y
Yes, but only after testing on themselves first.
@92W2JVT3yrs3Y
No, and it should have a consequence (jail)
@8YTK56X3yrs3Y
No, animals should be a beautiful part of nature, not a science experiment that only benefits humans.
@92XHX9V3yrs3Y
as long as they are not harmed
@LiamHal786386403yrs3Y
Yes and allow human testing
Deleted4yrs4Y
@8VDKWPC3yrs3Y
Yes, but try the drugs on cell lines instead of live animals to see the affects on the cells themselves.
Deleted4yrs4Y
No, use voluntary humans.
@8YRGX823yrs3Y
As long as the animals do not get harmed long term. There should always be a limit.
@47R4XTR4yrs4Y
Reasonable, mostly non-invasive & only with clearly defined protocols to protect human life. Should be minimized to greatest extent possible to protect animals.
@3GZTJR24yrs4Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and try to minimize the death/damage to the animal as much as possible
@3KQXSLC4yrs4Y
Yes, but never for cosmetics and only in other instances when there are no other possible avenues for testing
@8S6KWZM4yrs4Y
No, we should only allow human volunteers.
@5BMX4XT3yrs3Y
Yes for safety of drugs, caccines & medical devices. Not for cosmetics nor cosmetic surgeries.
@8QDSNZY4yrs4Y
It depends if the animal can feel the pain or be killed in the process, If the animal dies will it be a quick death. However, animals should never be tested with cosmetics.
@8QDSNZY4yrs4Y
It depends if the animal can feel the pain or be killed in the process however animals should never be tested with cosmetics.
@5643HNN4yrs4Y
Yes, but an animal safety board should be implemented to oversee the treatment of the animals during testing
@8QG5XSM4yrs4Y
depends on the animal in question
@8WNZXJ43yrs3Y
It depends on the animal, the risks of the product being faulty, etc.
@8YK8W8V3yrs3Y
No, this is animal cruelty and it shouldn't be towards others living things just because they can't do anything about it.
@88LK76J3yrs3Y
No test on convicted murders
@88LK76J3yrs3Y
No test on death row inmates
@88LK76J4yrs4Y
No test on violent prisoners instead
@88LK76J4yrs4Y
No test on violent life sentenced prisoners instead
@8PBKFCT4yrs4Y
Depends on the purpose, but do develop and encourage more alternatives such as computer simulation
@8RBQDDP3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as it is done in a safe way that does not harm the animal
@JadedCynical4yrs4Y
Yes but without harming the animal.
@8XJCSLP3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as it's humane
@8XQCYHB3yrs3Y
only on some kinds/breeds of animals
@8X3KQBN3yrs3Y
No, I believe this puts animals in too much risk and I think instead we should do testing on people who volunteer if they wish to help in some way with the development of vaccines since people can at least have a choice.
@932GCCP3yrs3Y
Yes, but only things like rats and stuff
@8K74H5F4yrs4Y
yes, but only certain animals
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Not for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically.
@8KX67Q94yrs4Y
Yes, only if they follow APA guidelines of ethical conduct.
@8ZGPKM93yrs3Y
no because we need animals or the natural and if they get killed then what are we gonna do and animals have completely different dna so it would not help us at all
@8WKT3PP3yrs3Y
No, unless it's absolutely necessary and there are no other options for testing
@8YTF5WC3yrs3Y
No because it might work on a animal but it could be harmful to humans.
@7PKT4CJ4yrs4Y
Yes, but the animals should be treated ethically
@8ZMSVTB3yrs3Y
Yes, but only on non-intelligent animals
@4CV2FF24yrs4Y
Yes, but only until sufficient models have been established and tested. Increase the funding for the research into these models.
@5V3GCM44yrs4Y
Yes, if the animals are collected sustainably.
@85Z5SQ34yrs4Y
As long as they are not harming the animal
@7GP32QV4yrs4Y
No, animals have the God-given right to live their lives to the fullest
@73TV8LT4yrs4Y
yes, but not with any domesticated species
@7NHW7HN3yrs3Y
Yes, but not for the cosmetics, and not excessively
@75KRFBJ4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as it does not harm the animal and is strictly regulated
@7VRTYM52yrs2Y
Yes, but only less important animals.
@7X7M5874yrs4Y
Yes, but small easily reproducible animals
@85QWNPG3yrs3Y
Yes, with riggorous oversight to maintain fair treatment for the animals in these situations.
@8BHX3T44yrs4Y
Animal testing should gradually be replaced with alternatives such as organ-on-a-chip technology
@842VWLK2yrs2Y
yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species
@842VWLK3yrs3Y
no, but allow it if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics
@8CNT65N4yrs4Y
Animals should not be the first option, but if it is the only option than possibly.
@8CR9F9J4yrs4Y
No, use people from death row to test for products.
@8D2HP7K4yrs4Y
Yes, in non-harmful ways.
@8DMZYLP4yrs4Y
No, it should be tested on humans that can give consent and understand the dangers
@8HJ6WYW4yrs4Y
Yes, but for vaccines and medical devices
@8HVQ4L54yrs4Y
Depends on how dangerous a procedure is.
@WickedNono4yrs4Y
No, testing should be done on volunteers, and/or violent offenders on death row, pedophiles, and rapists.
@8K7S5PZ4yrs4Y
No, because every animal, human included, have different reactions to the same drug or vaccine.
@8KK9JJV4yrs4Y
No, Not for testing that is inhumane.
@8LGFMHL4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as the treatments aren't very likely to harm them.
@8M2BGYV4yrs4Y
As long as it is not painful
@8M258QP3yrs3Y
No- prisoners should elect to be able to par take in this testing rather than animals if they are on death row- joining this program would halt death row.
@8MTVVS64yrs4Y
@BiiiigOlTitties4yrs4Y
Only after in vitro trials, to filter out more harmful effects.
@8P8MHKS4yrs4Y
Yes, but with greater oversight and regulation
@8PD6ZCL4yrs4Y
This should only be allowed of the animal in question is not an endangered species and if the product being tested is not highly dangerous to the health of the animal.
@8PJHVJN4yrs4Y
No, this is animal cruelty. Should be punishable by death
@8PHSP7Y4yrs4Y
Depends on the scenario; animal welfare must be strongly considered
@8PNGRTD4yrs4Y
Yes but ensure that animals will not be injured in the process.
@8PPDWMF4yrs4Y
No, test them on death row inmates instead.
@8QQGXLX4yrs4Y
We should use human prisoners instead
@8QKJ7R94yrs4Y
Yes, including cosmetics, because had testing been done, it could have prevented the use of cosmetics that have now been proven to be harmful. Thus, its use in cosmetics is medical.
@8R7TNX54yrs4Y
Join in on more popular conversations.
