Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 军费支出
TiS>TiS Personal answer减少 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
TiS>TiS Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
外交政策 › 联合国
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, in theory, the UN is a good idea, but it needs to be reformed to provide better solutions to the problems they are tackling |
社会 › 死刑
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, all humans, no matter how evil, have the right to live |
社会 › 堕胎
TiS>TiS Personal answerPro-life, for the whole life, womb to tomb |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but there should be mandatory rehabilitation for using drugs inappropriately |
外交政策 › 外国援助
TiS>TiS Personal answerDecrease, the US should not give aid to any foreign nations until the national debt is reduced |
罪行 › Private Prisons
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
TiS>TiS Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
TiS>TiS Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
移民 › 双重国籍
TiS>TiS Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 公民考试
TiS>TiS Personal answer应该,而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力 |
移民 › 技术移民
TiS>TiS Personal answer增长 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, this gives unnecessary power to the government and would waste taxpayer money |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, the importance of fossil fuels in today's society should be recognised, but we should move towards more sustainable energy |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
TiS>TiS Personal answer是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候 |
环境 › Animal Testing
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
TiS>TiS Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
TiS>TiS Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but only for people with a history of dangerous drug use |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
TiS>TiS Personal answer不 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, a mother and father structure is the best option for any child. Same-sex couples should only be able to adopt if there are not enough mother-and-father couples |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
经济 › 公司税
TiS>TiS Personal answerLower for small businesses, and keep the same for mid- and large-sized business, but elimate loopholes |
医保 › 安全港
TiS>TiS Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
经济 › 工会
TiS>TiS Personal answerHurt in some areas, and help in others, but private unions ultimately help |
经济 › 全民基本收入
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but it should be implemented slowly in case it does not work |
医保 › World Health Organization
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
TiS>TiS Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
TiS>TiS Personal answerNo, this discriminates against people who are allergic to the vaccine or can't have it for other reasons |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.