Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 军费支出
M>M Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
M>M Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
M>M Personal answer减少,我们不应该给任何国家对外援助 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
M>M Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 联合国
M>M Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
M>M Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
经济 › 税
M>M Personal answer取消所得税,禁止所有的减税并且提高销售税 |
移民 › 双重国籍
M>M Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 技术移民
M>M Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
M>M Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
M>M Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › 公民考试
M>M Personal answer应该,而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
M>M Personal answerYes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
M>M Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
环境 › Animal Testing
M>M Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
M>M Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
M>M Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
M>M Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
M>M Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
M>M Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
社会 › LGBT收养权
M>M Personal answerNo, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples |
医保 › 安全港
M>M Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
M>M Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
医保 › World Health Organization
M>M Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
社会 › Gender Transition
M>M Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
M>M Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
M>M Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
社会 › Hate Speech
M>M Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.