Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
SW>SW Personal answer应该,但仅针对致命的传染病 |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
SW>SW Personal answer不是,除非他们合法地进入此国家 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
SW>SW Personal answer减少 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
SW>SW Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
SW>SW Personal answer不,我很满意目前的支出额 |
社会 › 堕胎
SW>SW Personal answer主张堕胎合法,提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
SW>SW Personal answer不,这会增加意外枪击的风险 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
SW>SW Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
SW>SW Personal answer增长 |
经济 › 税
SW>SW Personal answerUse a negative income tax and change most welfare programmes to a direct cash grant under that setup, abolish many tax deductions also (mortgage interest deduction most notably). Tax capital gains at income rates, abolish the corporate income tax. This may have the effect of raising taxes on the rich, but may also require less spending. |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
SW>SW Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
SW>SW Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
移民 › 技术移民
SW>SW Personal answer增长 |
医保 › 精神健康
SW>SW Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
社会 › 安乐死
SW>SW Personal answer是,但前提是他们已经没有任何战胜病魔的可能 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
SW>SW Personal answer是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
移民 › 双重国籍
SW>SW Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
SW>SW Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
SW>SW Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
SW>SW Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
SW>SW Personal answer不 |
医保 › 大麻
SW>SW Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
移民 › 移民同化
SW>SW Personal answer不,我们应该拥抱移民为我们社会的多样性作出的贡献 |
外交政策 › 联合国
SW>SW Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
SW>SW Personal answer不需要,这是浪费时间浪费金钱。 |
环境 › Animal Testing
SW>SW Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
SW>SW Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
SW>SW Personal answer不 |
经济 › 国内工作
SW>SW Personal answer不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
SW>SW Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
SW>SW Personal answer是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
移民 › 公民考试
SW>SW Personal answer不 |
经济 › 经济刺激
SW>SW Personal answer应该,但采用增加基础设施支出的形式 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
SW>SW Personal answer应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
SW>SW Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
SW>SW Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
经济 › 政府养老金
SW>SW Personal answer在我们削减国债之前,不应该 |
经济 › 农场补贴
SW>SW Personal answer不,停止所有政府补贴,让自由市场自由管理 |
医保 › 安全港
SW>SW Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
SW>SW Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
经济 › 工会
SW>SW Personal answer理论上是有帮助的,但最近腐败现象太多,应该限制其权力 |
医保 › World Health Organization
SW>SW Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 关税
SW>SW Personal answer不,全球自由贸易体系对我们的企业和消费者来说更好 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
SW>SW Personal answer不 |
经济 › 社会福利
SW>SW Personal answer减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人 |
社会 › Hate Speech
SW>SW Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
经济 › State Ownership
SW>SW Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.