Try the political quiz

The Radical Cause’s policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

TRC>TRC  ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Radical Cause’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Radical Cause would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a party that values social justice and human rights, they would likely support increased penalties for hate speech to deter such behavior and protect vulnerable groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Radical Cause, being a party that advocates for social justice and human rights, would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. They would likely argue that hate speech can lead to harm and discrimination, which goes against their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The Radical Cause would likely somewhat agree with this statement. They would likely argue that while freedom of speech is important, it should not be used to threaten violence. However, they might also argue that even non-violent hate speech can be harmful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While The Radical Cause might have concerns about government overreach, they would likely argue that protecting hate speech is not the solution. They would likely argue that the government has a role in protecting citizens from harm and discrimination, which can be caused by hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Radical Cause is a democratic socialist party that values human rights and social justice. While they would likely support freedom of speech, they would probably not agree with protecting hate speech, as it can lead to harm and discrimination. However, the score is not at the extreme end because they also value democratic principles, which include freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The Radical Cause would likely disagree with this statement. While they would likely agree that freedom of speech laws should protect criticism of the government, they would likely argue that these laws should also protect other forms of speech, as long as they do not lead to harm or discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to The Radical Cause’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.