Fearless People’s Alliance Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Fearless People's Alliance would strongly agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas. This approach aligns with their goal of maintaining public safety and combating crime, while also addressing concerns about privacy by limiting surveillance to high-crime areas and supplementing it with a stronger police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Fearless People's Alliance would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high. This approach aligns with their goal of maintaining public safety while also addressing concerns about privacy by limiting surveillance to high-crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Fearless People's Alliance may agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they might see a stronger police presence as a more effective way to combat crime. However, they might not completely dismiss the potential benefits of video surveillance in conjunction with increased police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Fearless People's Alliance may somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places as a means to combat crime and maintain public safety. However, they might not fully support this measure without considering other factors, such as privacy concerns and the effectiveness of surveillance in reducing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Fearless People's Alliance would likely disagree with not increasing video surveillance, as they may see it as a necessary tool for maintaining public safety and combating crime. However, they might not be entirely against this stance if there are alternative solutions that address their concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Fearless People's Alliance would likely disagree with the notion that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, as they may see some level of surveillance as necessary for maintaining public safety. However, they might still have concerns about the balance between surveillance and privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.