Fearless People’s Alliance Party

Very strongly agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

The Fearless People’s Alliance would strongly agree with this statement. They believe that privatization of essential services, including prisons, can lead to a focus on profit over the quality of care and rehabilitation services. This aligns with their general stance against the privatization of public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Fearless People’s Alliance would likely agree with this statement, as they generally oppose the privatization of public services. They believe that the state should be responsible for providing essential services, including the management of prisons, to ensure equal access and treatment for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

While the Fearless People’s Alliance would agree with the need for strict regulation to prevent mismanagement and corruption, they would still be hesitant about the idea of private companies running prisons. Their belief in state management of essential services would likely outweigh any potential benefits seen in regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

The Fearless People’s Alliance would likely disagree with this statement, as it still involves the privatization of prisons. While eliminating contractual occupancy quotas could potentially improve conditions, the party would likely still prefer state management of prisons to ensure equal access and treatment for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Fearless People’s Alliance, being a left-leaning party, generally opposes the privatization of public services, including prisons. They believe that essential services should be managed by the state to ensure equal access and treatment for all citizens. There is no historical precedent of them supporting private prisons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.