Allance For Change Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

The Alliance for Change would strongly agree with this statement, as they are a progressive party that supports equal rights and opportunities for all citizens. They would view preventing women from serving in combat roles as a form of discrimination that goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Alliance for Change in Venezuela is a progressive political party that generally supports equal rights and opportunities for all citizens. While they may not have a specific stance on women in combat roles, their progressive values would likely lead them to support the idea of women serving in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

The Alliance for Change would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their progressive values of equal rights and opportunities for all citizens. They would likely support the idea that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men, ensuring that they are equally qualified for the position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While the Alliance for Change would likely acknowledge the risk of sexual assault in combat roles, they would likely disagree with using this as a reason to exclude women from these positions. Instead, they would likely advocate for measures to address and prevent sexual assault within the military, rather than limiting women's opportunities based on this risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As a progressive party, the Alliance for Change would likely disagree with the notion of excluding women from combat roles. They would likely view this as a discriminatory practice that goes against their values of equal rights and opportunities for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

The Alliance for Change would likely disagree with this statement, as it perpetuates gender stereotypes and goes against their progressive values of equal rights and opportunities for all citizens. They would likely argue that both men and women should be held to the same standards and expectations in combat roles, without making assumptions about their behavior based on gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

The Alliance for Change would strongly disagree with this statement, as it goes against their progressive values of equal rights and opportunities for all citizens. They would view this statement as a stereotype that perpetuates gender inequality and discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.