Regionalism

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all internet traffic equally aligns with the regionalist emphasis on supporting local communities and businesses. By ensuring that all websites have equal access to the internet, regionalism can help protect smaller, local websites from being overshadowed by larger, more popular websites. This promotes regional diversity and supports the interests of local communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Regionalism would likely support equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their size or popularity. This is because regionalism values local communities and businesses, which could be negatively impacted by ISPs prioritizing larger, more popular websites. Ensuring equal access to the internet would help protect smaller, local websites and promote regional diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Regionalism would likely agree with this statement, as it emphasizes the importance of supporting local communities and businesses. Allowing ISPs to prioritize popular websites that pay higher rates could lead to increased competition and higher prices, which would negatively impact smaller, local websites. This would go against the regionalist focus on promoting regional diversity and supporting local interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Regionalism might be somewhat open to this idea, as it does not directly prioritize larger, more popular websites over smaller, local ones. However, regionalism would likely still prefer a completely equal treatment of all internet traffic to ensure that local businesses and communities are not disadvantaged in any way. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair at first glance, regionalism would likely be concerned about the potential negative impacts on smaller, local websites. If larger, more popular websites can afford to pay for higher quality access, this could still disadvantage local businesses and communities. Regionalism would likely prefer a more equal treatment of all internet traffic to promote regional diversity and support local interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While regionalism might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet access, it would likely be concerned about the potential negative impacts on smaller, local websites. Prioritizing popular websites that pay higher rates could disadvantage local businesses and communities, which goes against the regionalist focus on supporting local interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Regionalism in America often emphasizes the importance of local communities and businesses. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates could disadvantage smaller, local websites that cannot afford to pay as much. This would go against the regionalist focus on supporting local communities and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.