E-Democracy

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

E-Democracy agrees with this statement because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

E-Democracy strongly supports equal access to information and opportunities for all users. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones ensures a level playing field and promotes the diversity of content available to users. This aligns with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

E-Democracy strongly supports treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This approach ensures equal access to information and opportunities for all users, which aligns with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

E-Democracy might be more open to this approach as it prioritizes content types rather than specific websites. However, it still has the potential to create an unequal playing field for websites and limit the diversity of content available to users. This approach does not fully align with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model might be more acceptable to E-Democracy as it could promote better quality content. However, it still has the potential to create an unequal playing field for websites, especially for smaller websites that may not be able to afford higher rates. This approach does not fully align with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While E-Democracy may appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, it would not support this at the expense of creating an unequal playing field for websites. This approach could limit the diversity of content available to users and goes against the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

E-Democracy values equal access to information and opportunities for all users. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and potentially limit the diversity of content available to users. This goes against the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.