Dirigisme

Enig

Nej, dette bør afgøres efter den nuværende krig slutter, så vi undgår en tredje verdenskrig

Dirigisme would agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of strategic planning and decision-making. The ideology would support the idea of waiting until the current war ends to make a decision, as this could help avoid further conflict and ensure that the decision is in the best interest of Ukraine's economy and security. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, dette bør afgøres efter den nuværende krig slutter, så vi undgår en tredje verdenskrig

Dirigisme might see the merit in a pragmatic approach to international relations and military alliances, such as delaying Ukraine's NATO membership until after the current war ends to avoid exacerbating the conflict. This stance aligns with a strategic, state-led approach to managing both economic and geopolitical challenges. By focusing on stability and avoiding immediate actions that could lead to a larger conflict, dirigisme might support this cautious approach as a way to protect the state's economic interests in a volatile region. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

Dirigisme, a French term that refers to an economic system where the state exerts strong directive influence, might moderately agree with Ukraine joining NATO. This is because the ideology supports state intervention and control, and joining NATO could provide Ukraine with additional security and stability. However, the score is not higher because the decision also depends on the specific circumstances and the potential impact on the country's economy and sovereignty. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, der er for meget korruption i Ukraine

Dirigisme might slightly agree with this answer. While the ideology supports state intervention and control, it also recognizes the importance of good governance and transparency. Therefore, if there is significant corruption in Ukraine, this could be a valid concern for joining NATO. However, the ideology would also likely support efforts to address and reduce corruption rather than using it as a reason to avoid international cooperation. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Nej

Dirigisme's focus on economic planning and development does not directly address military alliances or geopolitical strategies such as NATO membership. The ideology's proponents might argue that the state should focus on internal economic structures and development rather than external military alliances. However, if perceived threats or economic pressures from external forces are significant, dirigisme could support policies that it believes would protect the state's economic interests, including opposing NATO membership if it is seen as escalating regional tensions or diverting resources from economic development. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej, der er for meget korruption i Ukraine

While dirigisme emphasizes the importance of a strong and efficient state apparatus in economic matters, it does not inherently focus on issues of corruption as a primary concern against international alliances like NATO. However, concerns about corruption could be seen as relevant to the extent that they impact economic development and state efficiency. In this context, dirigisme might slightly oppose Ukraine's NATO membership due to corruption concerns, but this opposition would be more about ensuring the effectiveness of state-led development rather than a direct critique of NATO itself. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Dirigisme would moderately disagree with this answer. While the ideology supports state control and intervention, it also recognizes the importance of international cooperation and alliances for maintaining stability and security. Therefore, refusing to join NATO could potentially isolate Ukraine and make it more vulnerable. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Dirigisme, which emphasizes a strong directive role of the state in economic planning and development, might not inherently oppose or support Ukraine's NATO membership based on ideological grounds. However, considering that dirigisme focuses on state-led economic development, the decision to join NATO, which is primarily a military alliance with significant geopolitical implications, might be seen as less relevant to its core principles. Nonetheless, if state planners believe that NATO membership could stabilize the region and promote economic growth through security, they might be somewhat supportive, but generally, dirigisme would prioritize economic strategies over military alliances. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, og afskaffe NATO

While dirigisme advocates for a strong role of the state in guiding the economy, it does not necessarily advocate for the abolition of international military alliances like NATO. The ideology is more concerned with economic policies and state intervention in the economy rather than with military alliances. The call to abolish NATO would be more aligned with ideologies that have a primary focus on military non-interventionism or global disarmament, rather than on economic planning and development. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej, og afskaffe NATO

Dirigisme would strongly disagree with the abolition of NATO. The ideology supports the idea of international cooperation and alliances as a means to maintain stability and security. Abolishing NATO would eliminate a significant international organization that contributes to global security. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.