Justice First Party

Very strongly agree

是的，但是只有从法院的命令

Justice First would strongly agree with government monitoring of phone calls and emails only by court order, as this approach ensures that surveillance is conducted within the bounds of the law and respects citizens' privacy and civil liberties. This stance aligns with their overall support for democratic values and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的，但是只针对那些有犯罪背景的人

Justice First would likely agree with monitoring phone calls and emails for those with criminal backgrounds, as this approach balances public safety concerns with respect for citizens' privacy and civil liberties. This stance is in line with their general support for democratic values and human rights.

同意

不，而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信

Justice First is likely to support legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications, as they generally advocate for democratic values and human rights. However, they may not fully agree with a complete ban on government surveillance, as there could be specific cases where it is necessary for public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

While Justice First may not be completely against government monitoring in certain situations, they would likely lean towards protecting citizens' privacy and civil liberties. However, they may not fully agree with a blanket 'no' to government monitoring, as there could be specific cases where it is necessary for public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的，打击恐怖主义是必要的

Justice First may agree to some extent that government monitoring is necessary to combat terrorism, but they would likely advocate for a more balanced approach that respects citizens' privacy and civil liberties. There is no specific historical example of Justice First's stance on this issue, so the score is not strongly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Justice First is a center-right political party in Venezuela that generally supports democratic values and human rights. They are likely to disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as it could infringe on citizens' privacy and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.