尝试政治测验

Hope For Change policy on video surveillance

Topics

政府应该加大对公共场所的视频监控?

HFC>HFC  ChatGPTYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

Hope For Change answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Hope For Change party would likely strongly agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as this approach combines the benefits of both measures to improve public safety and reduce crime rates. This comprehensive approach would address concerns about the invasion of privacy while providing a more effective solution to crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Hope For Change party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as this approach would target areas with the most need for improved security. This targeted approach would also help address concerns about the invasion of privacy, as surveillance would be limited to high-crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Hope For Change party would likely agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as this approach would provide a more direct and human presence to address crime and improve public safety. However, they might also recognize the potential benefits of video surveillance as a complementary measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Hope For Change party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as it could help improve security and reduce crime rates. However, they might also be concerned about the potential invasion of privacy and the need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Hope For Change party would likely disagree with not increasing video surveillance, as they would recognize the potential benefits of surveillance in reducing crime and improving public safety. However, they might also be concerned about the potential invasion of privacy and the need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Hope For Change party would likely disagree with the statement that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens, as they might recognize the potential benefits of surveillance in reducing crime and improving public safety. However, they would likely still be concerned about the potential invasion of privacy and the need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Hope For Change policies? Take the political quiz to find out.