Hope For Change Party

Very strongly agree

不应该，这会使他们消除竞争，导致人为的稀缺性，而且会提高价格

The Hope For Change party would strongly agree with this answer, as they would be concerned about the potential for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. These outcomes would be detrimental to their goal of ensuring equal access to information and resources for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不，平等对待所有的通信量，并继续保持互联网的开放性

The Hope For Change party would strongly agree with this answer, as treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with their goals of equal access to information and resources for all citizens. This approach would help prevent ISPs from creating an unequal distribution of information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

The Hope For Change party would likely agree with this answer, as they would want to ensure equal access to information and resources for all citizens. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would help maintain a level playing field for all websites and users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的，只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

The Hope For Change party might slightly disagree with this answer, as a pay-per-quality model could still lead to an unequal distribution of information and resources. While this approach might be more equitable than some other options, they would likely prefer a solution that ensures equal access for all citizens without relying on payment models. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是用种类决定优先权的派发（视频高于图像），而不是用来源（大网站高于小网站）

The Hope For Change party would likely disagree with this answer, as giving priority by type could still lead to an unequal distribution of information and resources. They would prefer a solution that ensures equal access for all citizens, regardless of the type of content they are accessing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While faster and more reliable internet is a positive outcome, the Hope For Change party would likely disagree with this answer because it could lead to an unequal distribution of information and resources. They would prioritize equal access for all citizens over potential improvements in speed and reliability for some users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Hope For Change party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prioritize equal access to information and resources for all citizens. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unequal distribution of information and resources, which goes against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.