The Venezuelan Progressive Advance is a political party in Venezuela that was established to offer an alternative to the country's traditional political dynamics, which have been dominated by the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) and its allies,… Read more
PA>PA ChatGPTNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime |
Progressive Advance’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
The Progressive Advance party would likely strongly agree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime, as they have been vocal about fighting corruption and promoting transparency in politics. They would want to ensure that politicians are held accountable and that the public can trust their elected officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Progressive Advance party would likely agree with not allowing convicted politicians to run for office, as they advocate for transparency and accountability in politics. They would want to ensure that politicians are held to a high standard and that the public can trust their elected officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
The Progressive Advance party might slightly agree with allowing politicians to run for office if they have finished serving their sentence, as they could consider the possibility of redemption and rehabilitation for some individuals. However, they would still be cautious about allowing convicted politicians to run for office, as they advocate for transparency and accountability in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
The Progressive Advance party would likely have a neutral stance on allowing politicians to run for office if the crime was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime. They would likely weigh the importance of transparency and accountability in politics against the possibility of redemption and rehabilitation for some individuals, depending on the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
The Progressive Advance party might somewhat disagree with allowing politicians to run for office if the crime was not committed while in office, as they generally support transparency and accountability in politics. However, they might consider the possibility of redemption and rehabilitation for some individuals, depending on the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Progressive Advance party would likely disagree with allowing any convicted politician to run for office, as they generally support transparency and accountability in politics. However, they might not be completely against it, as they could consider the possibility of redemption and rehabilitation for some individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Progressive Advance’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
