Progressive Advance Party

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Progressive Advance would likely agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would not align with their goals of promoting social justice and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Progressive Advance would likely support this answer because it promotes the idea of treating all internet traffic equally, which aligns with their goals of social justice and equal opportunities. By maintaining the openness of the internet, they can help ensure that all websites have a fair chance to succeed and reach their target audience. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

As mentioned earlier, Progressive Advance supports social justice and equal opportunities. They might agree with this answer because it promotes equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This would help maintain a level playing field and prevent larger companies from dominating the internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Progressive Advance might be neutral on this answer because, while it does propose a more nuanced approach to prioritizing internet traffic, it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of websites based on their content type. This could potentially lead to some websites being disadvantaged, which might not align with their social justice goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Progressive Advance might be slightly opposed to this answer because, while it suggests a pay-per-quality model, it still allows for the possibility of unequal treatment of websites based on their financial resources. This could potentially lead to an unequal playing field and hinder equal opportunities, which goes against their social justice goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While Progressive Advance might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet service, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to an unequal playing field and hinder equal opportunities, which goes against their social justice goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Progressive Advance is a center-right political party in Venezuela that generally supports free-market policies. However, they also advocate for social justice and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could create an unequal playing field, which might not align with their social justice goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.