Try the political quiz

Popular Will’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

PW>PW  ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Popular Will’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Popular Will would strongly agree with this statement, as they are against practices that could lead to monopolies, artificial scarcity, and increased prices. They would likely view this as a threat to equal access and competition on the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Popular Will would strongly support treating all internet traffic equally, as this aligns with their progressive values and commitment to social justice. They would likely view net neutrality as essential for maintaining an open and fair internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Popular Will would likely support equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This stance aligns with their progressive values and commitment to social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While prioritizing traffic by type might seem like a more equitable approach, Popular Will would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to favor certain content providers or discriminate against others, which could undermine equal access and competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could still result in unequal access to the internet, as wealthier websites could afford to pay for better quality service. Popular Will would likely oppose any model that could lead to a tiered internet, as it goes against their commitment to social justice and equal access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet is a desirable goal, Popular Will would likely prioritize equal access over potential improvements in speed and reliability that come at the expense of less popular websites.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Popular Will is a progressive political party that values equal access to resources and opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Popular Will’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.