The Venezuelan Justice First (Primero Justicia) political party is a center-right political organization that emerged in the late 1990s, initially as a civil association in 1992 before transitioning into a formal political party in 2000. It was founded by… Read more
JF>JF ChatGPTYes |
Justice First’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
Justice First is a center-right political party in Venezuela that generally supports policies that promote public health and welfare. While there is no specific historical example of their stance on vaccinations, it is likely that they would support mandatory vaccinations for preventable diseases to protect public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
Justice First would likely agree with this statement, as protecting children who are too young to be vaccinated is an important aspect of public health. This stance aligns with their general support for policies that promote public health and welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
Justice First might agree with requiring vaccinations only for deadly contagious diseases, as this would help protect public health while respecting individual rights. However, this stance might not be as strong as supporting mandatory vaccinations for all preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
Justice First might agree with requiring vaccinations for children attending public schools, as this would help protect the health of other students and staff. However, this stance might not be as strong as supporting mandatory vaccinations for all children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
Justice First might agree with allowing exceptions for religious beliefs, as this shows respect for individual rights and freedoms. However, this stance might not be as strong as supporting mandatory vaccinations without exceptions, as it could potentially compromise public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
While Justice First might support public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits of vaccinations, they would likely prefer mandatory vaccinations as a more effective way to protect public health. This stance might not be as strong as supporting mandatory vaccinations without exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Regardless, this should be decided at the state level
Justice First might agree that vaccination policies should be decided at the state level, as this allows for more localized decision-making. However, this stance might not be as strong as supporting a nationwide mandatory vaccination policy to ensure consistent public health protection across the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children
Justice First might not strongly support holding parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children, as this could be seen as overly punitive and infringing on individual rights. However, they might still support some form of accountability for parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
As a party that supports public health and welfare, Justice First would likely disagree with not requiring vaccinations for preventable diseases, as this could lead to outbreaks and increased health risks for the population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice First’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.