Try the political quiz

Justice First’s policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

JF>JF  ChatGPTNo

Justice First’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

Justice First would likely agree with this statement, as they have consistently advocated for transparency and accountability in politics. For example, they have been critical of the Maduro regime's corruption and human rights abuses. Barring convicted criminals from running for office aligns with their goals of promoting a more just and transparent political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Justice First might somewhat agree with this statement, as they have been vocal about the need for transparency and accountability in politics. However, disallowing politicians under investigation might be seen as too extreme, as investigations can be politically motivated or lack sufficient evidence. They might prefer a more nuanced approach that takes into account the nature of the allegations and the evidence available. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Justice First might slightly agree with this statement, as it suggests a more nuanced approach to the issue. They might be open to allowing politicians with minor convictions to run for office, as long as the crime was not related to corruption, violence, or other serious offenses. However, they would likely still prefer a more stringent approach that prioritizes justice and transparency in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Justice First might be neutral on this statement, as it depends on the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. While they might be open to the idea of redemption and rehabilitation, they would likely still be cautious about allowing convicted criminals to run for office, especially if the crime was related to corruption or abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Justice First might disagree with this statement, as it implies that some crimes committed outside of office are acceptable for politicians. Given their emphasis on justice and transparency, they would likely prefer a more stringent approach that disqualifies politicians with any serious criminal convictions, regardless of when the crime was committed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Justice First (Primero Justicia) is a center-right political party in Venezuela that emphasizes the importance of justice, transparency, and the rule of law. They are likely to disagree with allowing convicted criminals to run for office, as it goes against their core principles. However, there might be some room for exceptions depending on the nature of the crime and the circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justice First’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.