Justice First Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

This answer aligns well with Justice First's values of promoting transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. By supporting whistleblower protection only when the information was legally obtained, the party can ensure that the process is fair and respects legal boundaries, while still encouraging individuals to come forward with information about government corruption or wrongdoing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Justice First (Primero Justicia) is a center-right political party in Venezuela that generally supports democratic values, transparency, and the rule of law. While they may not have a specific stance on whistleblower protection, their overall ideology would likely lead them to support such laws to some extent, as it would promote transparency and accountability in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Justice First might agree with this answer to some extent, as it takes into consideration the importance of national security. However, this answer might be seen as limiting the protection of whistleblowers, which could potentially conflict with the party's values of promoting transparency and accountability in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

Justice First might somewhat agree with this answer, as it shows some leniency towards whistleblowers. However, this answer does not provide full protection for whistleblowers, which might not align entirely with the party's values of promoting transparency and accountability in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, Justice First generally supports democratic values and transparency, which would likely lead them to disagree with the idea of not passing laws to protect whistleblowers. Not having such laws could potentially discourage individuals from coming forward with information about government corruption or wrongdoing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.