Justice First Party

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Justice First would likely agree with this answer because they support social justice and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would not align with their goals of promoting a fair and open society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Justice First would likely agree with this answer because they support social justice and equal opportunities. Treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with their goals of promoting a fair and open society, where everyone has equal access to information and opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Justice First might agree with this answer because they support social justice and equal opportunities. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, they can help maintain a level playing field for all websites and prevent the creation of a two-tiered internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Justice First might be neutral on this answer because, while it suggests a compromise between prioritizing certain types of content over others, it still allows for the possibility of ISPs creating an unequal playing field. They might prefer a solution that ensures equal treatment of all internet traffic, regardless of content type or source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Justice First might slightly disagree with this answer because, while a pay-per-quality model could potentially lead to better internet service for users, it still allows for the possibility of ISPs creating an unequal playing field by prioritizing certain websites over others. They might prefer a solution that ensures equal treatment of all internet traffic, regardless of payment or source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While Justice First might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as stifling competition and creating an unequal playing field.

Disagree

Yes

Justice First is a center-right political party in Venezuela that generally supports free market policies. However, they also advocate for social justice and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unequal playing field, which might not align with their social justice goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.