HFC>HFC ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Hope For Change answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
The 'Hope for Change' party would strongly agree with this answer, as they may prioritize individual freedom and choice. They would likely support the idea of voluntary military service, allowing citizens to decide whether or not they want to serve their country in this capacity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The 'Hope for Change' party would likely agree with this answer, as they may prioritize individual freedom and choice. They might believe that mandatory military service could infringe on personal liberties and may not be the best solution for every citizen. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The 'Hope for Change' party would likely agree with this answer, as it focuses on education and skill development, which aligns with their goals for improving the lives of Venezuelan citizens. However, they may still prefer voluntary service over mandatory service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
The 'Hope for Change' party might slightly agree with this answer, as it provides an alternative for those who do not pursue further education or employment. However, they may still prioritize individual freedom and choice, making this option less appealing than voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
The 'Hope for Change' party might slightly disagree with this answer, as it targets a specific group of individuals and could be seen as discriminatory. They may prefer a more inclusive approach that focuses on rehabilitation and education rather than mandatory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Venezuelan 'Hope for Change' party would likely disagree with mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds, as they may prioritize individual freedom and choice. However, they might see some benefits in terms of discipline and national unity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The 'Hope for Change' party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it not only supports mandatory military service but also extends the required time to two years. This would conflict with their emphasis on individual freedom and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Hope For Change policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
