Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Healthcare

For Social Democracy Party

The Venezuelan For Social Democracy, known in Spanish as Acción Democrática (AD), is one of Venezuela's oldest and historically most significant political parties. Founded in 1941, it has played a pivotal role in the country's political…  Read more

Overview Policies Themes Ideology Discuss

For Social Democracy policy on marketing unhealthy products to youth

Filters

Topics

Should the government ban the promotion of products that contribute to unhealthy lifestyles for young people, such as vaping and junk food?

FSD>FSD  ChatGPTYes

For Social Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The For Social Democracy Party (PODEMOS), a political party in Venezuela, has historically aligned with socialist and social democratic principles, emphasizing the importance of state intervention in various sectors to protect public welfare. Given this ideological background, it is likely that the party would support measures aimed at improving public health, especially among young people. The party's support for government-led initiatives and policies that address social issues suggests a favorable view towards regulating products that could harm public health. However, without specific historical references to the party's stance on banning the promotion of unhealthy products, the score is a cautious positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the For Social Democracy Party's (PODEMOS) ideological leanings towards socialism and social democracy, it is less likely that they would oppose government intervention in regulating products harmful to public health. The party's general support for policies that aim to protect and improve the welfare of the population, particularly the youth, suggests a predisposition against promoting unhealthy lifestyles. While there might not be explicit statements from the party regarding the specific issue of banning the promotion of vaping and junk food, their overall political stance suggests a preference for regulatory measures over laissez-faire approaches in matters affecting public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to For Social Democracy policies? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

Mexico Slams U.S. Policies as Trump Renews Border War

President Claudia Sheinbaum suggested Tuesday that Mexico could retaliate with tariffs of its own, after U.S. President-elect Donald Trump threatened to impose 25% import duties on Mexican goods if the country doesn’t stop the flow of drugs and migrants across the border.Sheinbaum said she was willing to engage in talks on the issues, but said drugs were a U.S. problem.“One tariff would be followed by another in response, and so on until we put at risk common businesses,” Sheinbaum said, referring to U.S. automakers that have plants on both sides of the border.She said Tuesday that Mexico had done a lot to stem the flow of migrants, noting “caravans of migrants no longer reach the border.” However, Mexico’s efforts to fight drugs like the deadly synthetic opioid fentanyl — which is manufactured by Mexican cartels using chemicals imported from China — have weakened in the last year.Sheinbaum said Mexico suffered from an influx of weapons smuggled in from the United States, and said the flow of drugs “is a problem of public health and consumption in your country’s society.”Sheinbaum also criticized U.S. spending on weapons, saying the money should instead be spent regionally to address the problem of migration. “If a percentage of what the United States spends on war were dedicated to peace and development, that would address the underlying causes of migration,” she said.Sheinbaum’s bristly response suggests that Trump faces a much different Mexican president than he did in his first term.Back in late 2018, former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador was a charismatic, old-school politician who developed a chummy relationship with Trump. The two were eventually able to strike a bargain in which Mexico helped keep migrants away from the border — and received other countries’ deported migrants — and Trump backed down on the threats.

▲  1613 replies