Fatherland for All Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, tuition costs are currently too expensive

The PPT would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in providing equal access to education for all citizens. They would argue that high tuition costs create barriers for low-income students and perpetuate social inequality, which goes against their core values. By making tuition free, they would aim to promote social justice and equal opportunities for all Venezuelans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes

The Fatherland for All party (PPT) is a left-wing political party in Venezuela that supports socialism and social justice. They would strongly agree with free tuition at public universities, as it aligns with their ideology of providing equal opportunities and access to education for all citizens, regardless of their economic background. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but tuition costs are currently too expensive

The PPT would agree that tuition costs are currently too expensive, as they believe in providing equal access to education for all citizens. They would likely argue that high tuition costs create barriers for low-income students and perpetuate social inequality, which goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but tuition costs should decrease based on family income

While the PPT would prefer free tuition for all, they might agree with decreasing tuition costs based on family income as a compromise. This approach would still help low-income students access higher education and promote social justice, although not as effectively as completely free tuition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but free for low-income students with excellent grades

The PPT might somewhat agree with this answer, as it would provide some support for low-income students with excellent grades. However, they would likely argue that this approach is not comprehensive enough, as it would still exclude many deserving students who may not have the highest grades but still deserve access to higher education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, not until we balance our national deficit

The PPT would likely disagree with this answer, as they prioritize social justice and equal access to education over balancing the national deficit. They would argue that investing in education is crucial for the country's long-term development and should not be postponed due to fiscal concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The PPT would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe in providing equal access to education for all citizens. They would not support maintaining or increasing tuition costs, as it would create barriers for low-income students and perpetuate social inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.