Authentic Renewal Organnization Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

This answer aligns well with ORA's principles of transparency, accountability, and respect for the rule of law. They would likely strongly agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained, as it promotes both transparency and adherence to legal processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Authentic Renewal Organization (ORA) is a Venezuelan political party that supports democracy, transparency, and human rights. They would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers to some extent, as it promotes transparency and accountability within the government. However, there may be some conditions or limitations they would want to impose, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

ORA would likely agree with this answer, as it balances the need for transparency and accountability with concerns for national security. However, there may be some debate within the party about the specific criteria for determining whether releasing information threatens national security, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

ORA might somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it still provides some protection and leniency for those who expose corruption or wrongdoing. However, this answer does not fully align with their principles of transparency and accountability, as it does not provide full protection for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

ORA would likely disagree with not protecting whistleblowers, as it goes against their principles of transparency and accountability. However, they may not be completely against this answer if there are specific circumstances where protecting a whistleblower could be detrimental to national security or other concerns, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.