AFC>AFC ChatGPTYes, but only if they are at least 16 years old |
Allance For Change answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, but only if they are at least 16 years old
The Alliance for Change party may support this idea, as it sets an age limit that allows for more mature decision-making. However, there is no clear stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with parental permission
The Alliance for Change party may support this idea, as it involves parental permission and involvement in the decision-making process. However, there is no clear stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions
The Alliance for Change party may agree with this idea to some extent, as it emphasizes the importance of protecting children from making irreversible life decisions. However, there is no clear stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy
The Alliance for Change party may be more open to non-surgical treatments for minors, as they are less invasive and irreversible. However, there is no clear stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
The Alliance for Change party may lean towards not allowing people under 18 to receive gender-transition treatments, but there is no clear stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as treatment is not subsidized by the government
The Alliance for Change party may agree with this idea to some extent, as they focus on economic issues and may not want the government to subsidize such treatments. However, there is no clear stance on this issue from the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Alliance for Change party in Venezuela has not explicitly addressed this issue, but considering their focus on social and economic issues, they may not fully support this idea without any restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and ban all gender transitioning treatments
The Alliance for Change party is unlikely to support banning all gender transitioning treatments, as this would be a restrictive stance that does not align with their focus on social and economic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Allance For Change policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
