Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

Allance For Change policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

AFC>AFC  ChatGPTNo

Allance For Change answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

The Alliance for Change would likely agree with this statement, as they aim to promote transparency and accountability in politics. Barring convicted criminals from running for office would help ensure that politicians are held to a higher standard and maintain public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The Alliance for Change would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they advocate for transparency and accountability in politics. However, they might not fully support disallowing politicians under investigation, as this could potentially be abused to target political opponents without a conviction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Alliance for Change might somewhat agree with this statement, as it sets specific limitations on the types of crimes that would disqualify a politician from running for office. This approach could strike a balance between allowing for redemption and rehabilitation while still maintaining public trust in the political system by excluding those with serious criminal convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Alliance for Change might slightly agree with this statement, as it allows for the possibility of redemption and rehabilitation for politicians who have served their sentences. However, they might still be concerned about the potential impact on public trust in the political system if convicted criminals are allowed to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Alliance for Change's stance on this issue is not clear, as they primarily focus on transparency and accountability in politics. They might be neutral on this statement, as it allows for some leniency for politicians who have committed crimes unrelated to their political careers, but it could still undermine public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Alliance for Change is a coalition of opposition parties in Venezuela, which generally advocate for transparency and accountability in politics. They would likely disagree with allowing convicted criminals to run for office without any restrictions, as it could undermine public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Allance For Change policies? Take the political quiz to find out.