Allance For Change Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The Alliance for Change would likely strongly agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained. This aligns with their principles of transparency and accountability in government, while also ensuring that the information was obtained through legal means, which is important for maintaining the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Alliance for Change in Venezuela is a coalition of opposition parties that generally support transparency and accountability in government. They would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers to some extent, as it helps expose corruption and hold the government accountable. However, there may be some concerns about national security and the legality of the information obtained. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The Alliance for Change would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers if releasing the information does not threaten national security. This aligns with their principles of transparency and accountability in government, while also taking into consideration the importance of national security. However, there may be some debate within the party about what constitutes a threat to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

The Alliance for Change might somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it shows some leniency towards those who expose corruption or wrongdoings. However, this answer does not fully align with their stance on transparency and accountability, as it does not provide full protection for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Alliance for Change would likely disagree with not protecting whistleblowers, as they believe in transparency and accountability in government. Not protecting whistleblowers could discourage individuals from coming forward with information about corruption or other wrongdoings, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.