Try the political quiz
+

Reply

  @ForWheelen from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

Estates have already been taxed. Taxes on estates tend to hurt the small business owner where businesses and farms have to be sold off to pay the tax

 @9334YP3answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, taxation is theft, which makes estate tax grave robbery. It should be abolished entirely for all US citizens.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but depending on the person's stability in income. The tax rate should be set on how much money the recipient is inheriting and how much money they already have.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but lower taxes for the middle and low-income citizens first and eliminate all loopholes for the rich, depending on the person's stability in income. The tax rate should be set on how much money the recipient is inheriting and how much money they already have.

 @8YPV9GGanswered…3yrs3Y

Start the estate tax at zero for small sums, and gradually/progressively increase it for larger values.

 @4W48KKZanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes. Financial assets should be only taxed as basic income, and physical assets should only be taxed based on their value when sold by the recipient.

 @8KX67Q9 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No. Deceased people's property is still a source of income. People should not be allowed to get away with not paying tax for their assets just because it was passed down to them; otherwise, it's just free money for heirs and heiresses.

 @92YHQCV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and increase it at a progressive rate, unless the people are satisfied with the current rate

 @54HGKDPanswered…3yrs3Y

Estate tax should be calculated on the total sum of the estate in question. It should also take into account the tax bracket of the recipient of that tax.

 @8R7SQ2V from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, at least not yet. We can talk about that after we deal with the deficit.

 @8H4DF7B from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

Do a study on the efficiency and ethics and effects of each tax and apply accordingly.

 @6RW5J4M from Louisiana  answered…3yrs3Y

 @75PWV57 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, maintain the current rate and lower the threshold to estates with a value greater than $3 million

 @85QWNPG from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, by eliminating it and allowing all tax to be under the veil of either income tax on the personal scale, or a yearly charged vat value upwards of 30% on all sales from corporations.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, lower the rate to 28% but also lower the threshold to estates valued in excess of $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, lower the rate to 28% but also lower the tax threshold to estates valued in excess of $2 million

 @86N5Z35 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and No, lower the current rate to somewhere between 25% - 28%, but also lower the threshold to all estates with a value greater than $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8CGQ47N from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, lower the rate to 30% but also lower the estate value threshold to $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and No, lower the current rate to somewhere between 25% - 28% but lower the threshold to all estates with a value greater than $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and No, lower the current rate to somewhere between 25% - 28% but also lower the threshold to all estates with a value greater than $3 million

 @8CYG8KL from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but don't get rid of the tax, just lower the rates by the amount of years they worked, and how much they have paid taxes, minorities are not subject to the tax even if they do work and pay tax at the register.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, lower the estate tax rate to 25% but also lower the estate value threshold to $3 million.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, lower the estate tax rate to 25% but also lower the estate value threshold to $2 million.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and lower the threshold to estates with a value greater than $3 million.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and lower the threshold to estates that are valued at more than $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, lower the estate tax rate to 28% but also lower the estate value threshold to $3 million.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, lower the estate tax rate to 28% but also lower the estate value threshold to $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, lower the estate tax rate to 28% and also lower the estate value threshold to $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, lower the rate to 25% but also lower the tax threshold to estates valued in excess of $3 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and lower the tax threshold to estates valued in excess of $3.5 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, lower the rate to 28% but also lower the tax threshold to estates valued in excess of $2.75 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, lower the estate value threshold to $3 million and then lower the estate tax rate to 28%

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, lower the rate to 28% but also lower the threshold to estates valued in excess of $2 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, lower it to a rate within the range of 25% - 28%, but also lower the tax threshold to estates with a value greater than $2 million

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, reduce the current rate to the 25% - 28% range but also lower the threshold to estates with a value greater than $3 million

 @8FCV27F from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

I think the estate tax should decrease in proportion to the number of children you have.

 @8FCV27F from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

I think the estate tax should decrease in proportion to the number of children you have, thus incentivizing population growth and decreasing income inequality.

 @8LG9WPJ from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes on those making under $250,000 a year and eliminate loopholes for high-income earners.

 @NotShaggy3 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NVXWB2 from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8SG6GF5 from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TMFV7P from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

  @8VHBC3L from West Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8YJ6ZGY from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

  @MSelvig from Wyoming  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92ZYZRW from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

No it should be drastically increased unless the "estate" is land used by farmers in which most of the worth of it is in equipment or land so that when it's passed on to younger generations it doesn't immediately bankrupt them.

 @93Q2878 from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y