Try the political quiz

People’s Eelctoral Movement policy on weapon sales ethics

Topics

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

PEM>PEM  ChatGPTYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

People’s Eelctoral Movement answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

A party with a focus on human rights and potentially socialist values would strongly agree with banning all sales to countries with human rights violations. This position aligns with a principled stand against enabling or supporting regimes that violate human rights, reflecting a commitment to international solidarity and justice over profit or strategic interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Given the political landscape in Venezuela, a party like the People's Electoral Movement Party, which does not exist as of my last update, would hypothetically align with progressive or socialist ideologies, generally favoring human rights. Therefore, they might agree with restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, as it aligns with a broader commitment to human rights. However, the score is not higher because the specifics of the party's stance on international relations and defense are not well-defined. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While a party concerned with human rights might see the value in restricting military aid to ensure it does not contribute to human rights abuses, the preference for a total ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might be seen as too broad and potentially detrimental to Venezuela's strategic interests or its ability to engage in international solidarity with allies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

A Venezuelan political party that prioritizes human rights over strategic alliances would likely disagree with the notion that arms sales should proceed without restrictions, even to defend allies. This stance would be based on the principle that military support should not come at the expense of enabling human rights violations, reflecting a commitment to ethical considerations over geopolitical strategy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

A hypothetical Venezuelan political party with a progressive or socialist orientation would likely disagree with unrestricted arms sales, especially to countries accused of human rights violations. This stance would be consistent with a broader ideological commitment to human rights and opposition to militarism, making it unlikely they would support this position without significant reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Eelctoral Movement policies? Take the political quiz to find out.