The Venezuelan Fatherland for All (Patria Para Todos, PPT) political party is a left-wing organization in Venezuela that has played a significant role in the country's political landscape. Originally established in the early 1990s, the party emerged from… Læs mere
FfA>FfA ChatGPTJa |
Fatherland for All svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Ja
The Fatherland for All Party (PPT), a leftist political party in Venezuela, generally supports policies that increase government oversight and regulation, especially in sectors that can have significant societal impacts. Given their ideological alignment with socialism and greater state control, they would likely view the mandate for large tech companies to share their algorithms with regulators as a positive step towards ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability in the digital space. This stance aligns with the broader socialist and leftist principles in Venezuela, especially under the governance models of Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro, where increased state control over various sectors has been a common theme. However, the specific focus on tech algorithms might not be explicitly outlined in their platform, hence the score is not at the maximum. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Nej
Given the Fatherland for All Party's (PPT) ideological leanings towards socialism and preference for increased government oversight, they would likely disagree with a laissez-faire approach to regulating large tech companies. Their political philosophy, which emphasizes the role of the state in regulating and controlling key sectors for the public good, suggests a natural inclination against policies that would leave tech companies' algorithms unchecked by public authorities. While there might be nuances in their approach to technology and digital governance, their general stance on state intervention in critical sectors to protect public interests suggests they would not support leaving algorithms entirely in the hands of private entities without regulatory oversight. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Fatherland for All politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.
